汉语量词重叠与“一”加重叠式的语言学研究

论文价格:免费 论文用途:其他 编辑:硕博论文网 点击次数:
论文字数:32444 论文编号:sb2019012720574224730 日期:2019-02-13 来源:硕博论文网
本文是一篇语言学论文,本文的重要性主要体现在:首先,通过对比“CC”与“一 CC”两种形式,本文提出了新的区分点,更好地解释了两种表达的差异。其次,对一直以来量词重叠与“一”的研究中存在争议的地方提供了新的见解和补充,否认“一 CC”中的“一”为数词的传统观点,深化了对汉语量词重叠的认识。

Chapter 1 Introduction

1.1.  Motivation of the Thesis
Classifier  reduplication  has  always  been  an  interesting  issue  which  has  triggered  many other  investigations  within  linguistic  researches.  It  has  been  heatedly  discussed  perhaps because of its productivity. There are a lot of discussions on classifier reduplication and some indeed  provide  us  valuable  insights  to  syntactic  structures  and  semantic  features  of reduplicative  classifiers  (宋玉柱,  1978,  1981;  邵敬敏,  1993;  郭继懋,  1999;  Cheng  & Sybesma, 1998; Yang, 2015; Zhang, 2013, 2014; etc.). 
However,  although  great  research  achievements  have  been  made  in  the  classifier reduplication in Mandarin Chinese, there are still some issues left to be solved. For example, on the one hand, there is  a small number of studies to make a united and overall discussion about  the  conditions  and  effects  of  yi  on  yi-classifier  reduplication.  Lots  of  arguments  are made to pay attention to the features of CC and yi CC these two forms of reduplication as a whole, which means most of linguists are tend to just analyze the external environment with other constituents rather than the internal differences between two forms. On the other hand, the function of yi in classifier reduplication also is rarely analyzed. The previous studies assert yi in yi CC structure is a numeral, but we disagree with this opinion. 
Thus,  based  on  previous  researches,  the  thesis  will  analyze  the  two  forms  of  classifier reduplication,  attempting  to  reveal  the  properties  of  classifier  reduplication  in  Mandarin Chinese. 
..........................

1.2.  Background of the Thesis
Reduplication  is  a  common  phenomenon  in  Sino-Tibetan  languages  and  Austronesian languages.  In  Chinese,  classifier  reduplication  originates  from  the  years  of  Wei  Jin  and  the Northern  and Southern  Dynasties and  rapidly develops during the Tang  and Five Dynasties. (Wang,  1958)  From  the  Song  and  Yuan  Dynasties  to  modern  times,  it  has  been  becoming more  mature  and  complete.  The term “classifiers” is  used as an umbrella  label  for  a  wide range of noun categorization device. It is divided into seven kinds (Aikhenvald, 2000). In this thesis, the term ‘classifier’ is applied almost to all the words combined with numerals. Li & Thompson (1981:104) once said, ‘To a speaker of English, one of the most striking features of the Mandarin noun phrase is the classifier.’  Generally  speaking,  classifiers  have  two  basic  usages:  one  is  combined  with  numerals and  noun  to  form  a  Numeral+Classifier+Noun  structure.  Numerals  and  classifiers  usually coexist in this structure, and a classifier appears between the Num and N positions. (Li, 1999) The other is classifier reduplication. There are considerable papers help us to comprehend its grammatical  meanings:  ‘every’,  ‘many’  and  ‘one  by  one’.  (Song  Yuzhu,  1981;  Hu  Yushu, 1981; Li Yuming, 1996; Guo Jimao, 1999; Zhang Hengyue, 2012; Yang Kairong, 2015; ect.)
.......................

Chapter 2 Literature Review

2.1 Classifier Reduplication
Classifier  reduplication  is  a  productive  system  in  Mandarin  Chinese.  Many  scholars believe that it includes CC, yi CC, and ‘yiC yiC’ structures, which can express the meaning of ‘every’,  ‘many’  and  ‘one  by  one’.  In  this  thesis,  only  CC  and  yi  CC  are  taken  into consideration as classifier reduplication.
2.1.1 Types of Classifiers to Reduplication
With respect to the issue about what kinds of classifier can be reduplicative, Lu Jianming (1986) has claimed that classifiers that can be reduplicative are projected at about 12 percent of the whole classifier system. Some of the common classifiers are: ge, gen, tiao, zhang, ceng, ye, jian, xiang, pan etc. Moreover, scholars also focus on the restriction of sounds. Disyllabic classifiers cannot be reduplicative to express every in English, as well as borrowed classifier in  spite  of  syllabic,  such  as  mi  (meter),  ke  (gram),  miao  (second).  (Chao,  1968;  Shi  Yuzhi, 1996).
Hua  Yuming  (2003)  comes  up  with  several  classifiers  that  cannot  be  reduplicative: monosyllable  noun  temporarily  working  as  a  classifier  cannot  be  reduplicative;  standard measure like yuan, jiao, fen (monetary units), chi, mi (length units), and indefinite classifier xie  (some)  cannot  be  reduplicative;  all  of  multi-syllable  classifiers  cannot  be  reduplicative, such as gongjin (kilogram) and gongli (kilometer); classifiers with derogatory senses  cannot be reduplicative like bang (gang), huo (gang) and lu (kind); classifiers expressing solemn and written  colors  also  cannot  be  reduplicative  like  wei  (an  individual  classifier  to  express respects to people) and zun (an individual classifier used for statues of God and Buddha).
.............................

2.2 Yi
Numerals in Mandarin  Chinese sometimes express the logical meaning,  and sometimes express  non-logical  meaning.  According  to  the  grammatical  functions  and  semantic relationship, scholars categorize numerals into true-value and non-true-value numerals. Yi, as the smallest numeral in Chinese, is called the beginning of numerals. It plays an indispensable role in daily life and  frequently used in many situations. The expression of yi is much more complex  than  that  of  other  numerals.  The  understanding  of  syntactical,  semantic  and pragmatic functions of yi facilitates the research of numeral system and other relevant issues about Mandarin Chinese.
The  partition  of  true-value  and  non-true-value  is  an  important  tool  in  languages.  Xing Fuyi (2003) has made deep researches on yi. He thinks that the true-value and non-true-value numerals  have  some  differences,  mainly  in  the  semantics.  The  semantic  differences  are  the results  of  distribute  position  under  particular  grammars.  For  true-value  numeral,  it  usually expresses the logical quantity of numerals. All of true-value numerals can freely replace their positions, which would not influence their constituents in sentences. For example,

........................
Chapter 3 Comparison of the Forms of CC and Yi CC ............................ 15
3.1 Similarities .......................... 15
3.1.1 Unit-plurality ..................................16
3.1.2 The Restrictions of Classifier to Reduplication .................. 16
Chapter 4 Yi and Reduplicative Classifiers ................................. 28
4.1 Yi in the Yi CC Structure not as a Real Numeral ............................. 28
4.2. Yi CC Structure not Just as an Existential Quantifier .................... 29

Chapter 4 Yi and Reduplicative Classifiers

4.1 Yi in the Yi CC Structure not as a Real Numeral
From the previous studies of classifier reduplication, most of scholars believe that yi CC structure  is  combined  with  numeral  yi  based  on  the  reduplicative  form  CC.  While  in  this thesis, we hold that yi in the structure of yi CC isn’t a real numeral. There are two properties to prove this opinion. Different from other numerals, so we will use the RED-YI to refer the yi in classifier reduplication in the following sections. 
On the one hand, the RED-YI is not paradigmatic relations with any other numerals. If yi is a numeral in the form of yi CC, it’s also acceptable when yi is replaced by, and in contrast to another numeral in this condition, as shown in (28) (Steindl 2010: 69). But these example already show that only yi can occur in this form except other numerals.
........................

Conclusion

Major Findings of the Current Study
This  thesis  begins  with  some  facts  and  observations  of  classifier  reduplication  and yi-classifier  reduplication.  I  have  explained  some  issues  on  the  classifier  reduplication  in Mandarin  Chinese.  Based  on  the  previous  studies  on  classifier  reduplication  in  Mandarin Chinese, I put forward to two questions that are answered in chapter two to chapter four of the thesis:
1) What are the similarities and differences between CC and yi CC structures?
2)  What  is  the  role  of  yi  in  yi-classifier  reduplication?  Why  are  some  classifiers  that cannot be applied into CC structure suitable to the yi CC structure?
On the first question, we have compared the two forms of classifier reduplication: Yi CC and CC structure. For the similarities, categorized as classifier reduplication, both of them can express  the  unit-plurality  and  have  several  same  restrictions  for  the  selected  classifiers.  For the  differences,  we  have  analyzed  them  from  the  following  aspects:  First,  yi  CC  structure allows the existence of exception, while CC structure cannot. Second, yi CC structure focuses more overall view, while CC structure pays more attention to each unit. Third, yi CC structure have static property, which cannot occur in some contexts with the dynamic feature, but CC structure  can.  It  is  those  differences  that  make  us  surprised  for  the  occurrence  of  the phenomena.
reference(omitted)

如果您有论文相关需求,可以通过下面的方式联系我们
点击联系客服
QQ 1429724474 电话 15800343625